<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Energy Solutions &#187; 2008 &#187; October &#187; 28</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.heliopower.com/2008/10/28/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.heliopower.com</link>
	<description>A Sustainable Energy Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:30:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Proposition 7 Analysis from Solar Industry</title>
		<link>http://blog.heliopower.com/2008/10/proposition-7-analysis-from-solar-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heliopower.com/2008/10/proposition-7-analysis-from-solar-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>glenna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heliopower.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From industry advocacy group, Vote Solar.com, comes this information to review concerning Proposition 7 on the California ballot:
Proposition 7 (pdf) is a California ballot initiative that would dramatically increase the state’s renewable energy requirement, to 50% renewables by 2025. Yet most environmental groups and almost all renewable energy companies and trade associations oppose it. Why?
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From industry advocacy group, <a href="http://www.votesolar.org/index.html" target="_blank">Vote Solar.com</a>, comes this information to review concerning Proposition 7 on the California ballot:</p>
<p><a href="http://ag.ca.gov/cms_pdfs/initiatives/i736_07-0067_Initiative_A1S.pdf" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #0100aa;">Proposition 7 </span></strong></a>(pdf) is a California ballot initiative that would dramatically increase the state’s renewable energy requirement, to 50% renewables by 2025.<span> </span>Yet most environmental groups and almost all renewable energy companies and trade associations oppose it.<span> </span>Why?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The problem is not with the goal. We urgently need to increase our usage of renewable energy to 50%&#8211;and more.<span> </span>The problem is that the initiative is unlikely to deliver the desired result.<span> </span>Most of the opposition comes from a belief that Proposition 7 is so flawed that it will make the task of growing renewable energy markets harder, not easier.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Different groups have found many elements of the initiative problematic.<span> </span>You can read CalSEIA’s analysis <a href="http://calseia.org/proposition-7-analysis.html" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #0100aa;">here</span></strong></a>, Union of Concerned Scientists <a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/solutions/renewable_energy_solutions/no-on-CA-prop-7.html" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #0100aa;">here</span></strong></a>, and NRDC’s <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/calballotinitiatives2008.asp" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #0100aa;">here</span></strong></a>. (The Solar Alliance, American Wind Energy Association, and the Large Scale Solar Association all also oppose).<br />
For the balance of the article and analysis, click <a href="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1179/blog/comments.jsp?blog_entry_KEY=23235&amp;t=" target="_blank">here. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heliopower.com/2008/10/proposition-7-analysis-from-solar-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

